Tomohiro Masabayashi vs Dac Tien Nguyen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W L L W L
Form
L W W W L L W W L LHead To Head: Masabayashi 1 - 0 Nguyen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Masabayashi winning 2 and Nguyen winning 1. The last match between Masabayashi and Nguyen was at the M25 Tay Ninh, 04-10-2022, First, Hard with Tomohiro Masabayashi getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tomohiro Masabayashi | 1 |
| Dac Tien Nguyen | 0 |
M25 Tay Ninh(04-10-2022)
6
3
2
6
6
0
| Masabayashi | Stats | Nguyen |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (5-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 722 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 722 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (123-109) | Career Total W/L | 32% (6-13) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Masabayashi VS Nguyen H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Dac Tien Nguyen
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Masabayashi VS Nguyen H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 9 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:45:0 | Average Match Time | 1:45:0 |
| 65% (44/68) | 1st Serve % | 57% (43/75) |
| 68% (30/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (26/43) |
| 54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 47% (35/75) | Return Points Win % | 37% (25/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tomohiro Masabayashi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Koray Kirci
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Dac Tien Nguyen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Dac Tien Nguyen
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Player
Dac Tien Nguyen
53%
(
49 of
93)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
14
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
0
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
34%
(
15 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dac Tien Nguyen
Player
Gourav Gulia
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Dac Tien Nguyen
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Dac Tien Nguyen
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
1-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dac Tien Nguyen
Player
Kazuma Kawachi
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dac Tien Nguyen
Player
Winter Meagher
43%
(
32 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Dac Tien Nguyen
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (123/109) | Win/Loss | 32% (6/13) |
| 53% (273/247) | Sets Win/Loss | 33% (14/28) |
| 51% (2426/2300) | Games Win/Loss | 43% (156/210) |
| 53% (98/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 32% (6/13) |
| 55% (17/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (8/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 306 | Aces Total | 28 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 229 | Total Double Faults | 44 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 376.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 356.37 |
| 61% (5351/8752) | 1st Serve % | 51% (411/806) |
| 63% (3366/5351) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (259/411) |
| 49% (1659/3401) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (148/395) |
| 46% (416/910) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (33/82) |
| 40% (3469/8578) | Return Points Win % | 40% (316/789) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 29% (2/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (121/104) | Futures W/L | 35% (6/11) |
| 52% (120/229) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (6/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (13/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (29/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 88% (125/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (7/6) |
| 12% (125/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (7/1) |
| 12% (107/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (12/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
